The result of an unfavorable psychophysiological credibility evaluation through the police hiring course of, and even throughout inner investigations for current officers, doesn’t routinely disqualify a candidate or result in disciplinary motion. It’s typically thought-about one piece of knowledge amongst many who contribute to a broader analysis. The importance of this information level varies relying on departmental insurance policies and the context of the evaluation.
A adverse consequence can elevate issues and immediate additional investigation. Legislation enforcement companies typically use the evaluation as a instrument to establish potential areas of danger or dishonesty. Whereas the evaluation itself isn’t admissible as proof in court docket, the knowledge gleaned from the pre-test interview and post-test questioning can present leads for investigators to pursue by different strategies, akin to background checks, interviews with references, and critiques of documentation. The outcomes might reveal inconsistencies or areas needing additional clarification.
